Posts Tagged by Supreme Court
Rick Santorum and Felony Disenfranchisement
| March 27, 2012 | Posted by JerriCook under Constitutional Law, Equal Protection, Fourteenth Amendment, Legal Issues, Political Correctness |
It’s long been an American cornerstone—those who have done the crime and served the time deserve a chance to rejoin society as a productive member. Ex-cons who go to school, get a job, and become active in their communities are often a force for good in communities where crime is rampant and drugs are ubiquitous. They become role models. So, why can’t these role models participate in the political process? By what authority are they banned from a major part of American society? (more…)
Abort, Restrict, and Destroy-The War on Faith
| February 16, 2012 | Posted by JerriCook under Constitutional Law, First Amendment, Law School, Legal Issues, Media, Political Correctness |
I have something to say to all you Kumbaya Catholics out there—I told you so. I remember the last time I was at Mass. The Deacon was spouting about how it is my duty to pay for health insurance for the “poor.” I was supposed to pray for (to?) Barack Obama (from the sound of it, you would have thought the Church was on the verge of making him a Saint). So, how’s all that Kumbaya crap working out for you? Ahhh, liberalism, you gotta love it. The Catholic Church, the first and only Church ordained by Christ Himself, is now firmly under the thumb of the oligarchs who control the government. The Church will, by Government edict, pay for and promote Government policies that are abhorrent to people of faith. Seriously, who didn‘t see this coming? (more…)
When Race-Based Laws Collide Head-On
| January 13, 2012 | Posted by JerriCook under Equal Protection, Fourteenth Amendment, Political Correctness |
The dreaded head-on vehicular collision, nearly always fatal, and any survivors face a life-long certainty of gruesome physical and emotional wounds, neither of which ever seems to heal completely. And such is the case when race-based laws collide head-on. The consequences are brutal and hard to look at close up, and that’s the problem—neither the judiciary nor the legislature has to endure the consequences of their contradictory actions. If they did, they might not be so willing to deal with the issues of race and adoption in a manner which, while promoting political correctness, bruises families to their soul. (more…)
Loading ...